There is a structural error in how the human brain models itself. Fixing it has a profound effect on human suffering.

Six claims

The six claims

Reveals the page's layout grid, how the six claims depend on each other, and whether each claim is a diagnosis, a hypothesis, or a design.

  1. The flaw

    Diagnosis

    The human self-model treats its own conclusions as evidence for itself, and it cannot see that it is a model. Confidence grows, accuracy doesn't, and “this is me” feels like fact.

    Read the argument

  2. The cost

    Diagnosis

    From that flaw come the sufferings only humans have: shame, defensiveness, identity threat, judgment of the self, and an inability to admit we were wrong.

    Read the argument

  3. The amplifier

    Diagnosis

    In a hypersocial species, the loop runs through other minds. Reputation becomes evidence, “me” scales into “us,” and modern technology tightens the loop.

    Read the argument

  4. The lever

    Hypothesis

    One structure sits upstream of many harms. Change it, and the benefit spreads everywhere at once.

    Read the argument

  5. The change

    Hypothesis

    What was learned during development, can be relearned. Careful training lets people hold the self as a model, keeping its power and losing its grip. The result is a profound gain in wellbeing.

    Read the argument

  6. The method

    Design

    We are building the AI that delivers this training: staged, paced to each person, and grounded in evidence the self-loop cannot fake.

    Read the argument